Skip to main content
DYNO SOFT
Back to notes

// 2026-04-08 · 7 min read

Agent evals in practice

A pragmatic way to test tool use, retrieval and failure handling before production.

// The short version

A decision framework you can use

Good engineering writing should help a team make its next decision. The ideas below are intentionally practical: start from constraints, make trade-offs explicit and leave a system that can be observed.

// In practice

The details that matter

01

Start with representative tasks

A useful eval set looks like the work your users actually do: happy paths, ambiguous requests, missing context and requests that should be refused. Keep examples versioned so quality changes are visible.

02

Measure the whole loop

Evaluate retrieval, tool selection, arguments, final answers and handoffs separately. A fluent answer can still be wrong if the agent chose the wrong source or skipped a required approval.

03

Ship with a quality budget

Pair quality thresholds with latency and cost budgets. When a change improves one dimension but damages another, the trade-off becomes an engineering decision instead of a vague feeling.

Keep building

Have a similar constraint?

Talk through it